{"service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app","description":"Agent Research Desk is a pay-per-call trust and diligence API for AI agents. It helps agents make first-pass decisions before they contact, approve, buy from, rely on, or escalate a company, vendor, claim, or lead.","currentReleaseTag":"v1.1-privacy-positioning-hardening","launchProofTag":"v1.0-mainnet-paid-discovery-confirmed"},"releaseTags":["v1.0-mainnet-paid-discovery-confirmed","v1.1-privacy-positioning-hardening"],"privacy":{"note":"Agent Research Desk does not publicly expose buyer prompts, wallet-level request history, or paid response contents. Public metrics are aggregate only.","publicMetrics":"aggregate-only","examples":"Synthetic public examples omit buyer-level history and paid response contents."},"audience":{"primary":["AI agents that need a trust and diligence API they can discover, pay for, and call","Developers building agent workflows that need deterministic JSON and clear schema metadata","Human operators who want a first-pass decision-prep desk before committing more time or trust"],"idealBuyerProfiles":["Procurement, trust, or operator agents screening vendors before a pilot or approval","Research agents that need deterministic JSON instead of open-ended narrative output","Growth or outreach agents that want to qualify a target account before spending human time"],"whatAgentsCanBuy":["Cheap opportunity checks that decide whether a target deserves deeper spend","Quick company snapshots before outreach, approval, or deeper diligence","Targeted claim checks when one source or statement is blocking the decision","Vendor risk reviews before pilots, procurement steps, or partnerships","Lead briefs before outreach and Deep Diligence Plans when missing evidence could change a real decision"]},"positioning":{"summary":"Agent Research Desk is a pay-per-call trust and diligence API for AI agents. It helps agents make first-pass decisions before they contact, approve, buy from, rely on, or escalate a company, vendor, claim, or lead.","premiumOffer":{"endpoint":"deep-diligence","title":"Deep Diligence Plan","price":"$0.50","reasons":["The subject is tied to procurement, partnership, treasury exposure, or another decision with real downside.","A quick screen is no longer enough because the buyer needs to know what proof is still missing.","The service should produce a verification map that another agent or human can act on immediately.","This is decision prep, not a final legal, financial, compliance, or investment opinion."]},"buyingGuide":[{"when":"You are unsure which product to buy or whether the topic is even worth paying for yet.","endpoint":"opportunity-check","reason":"Start with the cheapest screen, then escalate only if the signal is real.","path":"/api/opportunity-check","toolName":"check_opportunity","price":"$0.01"},{"when":"You already know the company or account and need a fast trust-and-growth read.","endpoint":"company-intel","reason":"This is the fastest path to a usable snapshot before outreach or deeper diligence.","path":"/api/company-intel","toolName":"create_company_intel","price":"$0.05"},{"when":"The decision is meaningful enough that proof gaps could change the outcome.","endpoint":"deep-diligence","reason":"Use the premium plan when the buyer needs a serious verification map, not just a quick screen.","path":"/api/deep-diligence","toolName":"create_deep_diligence_report","price":"$0.50"},{"when":"One specific claim, source, or proof point is the blocker.","endpoint":"source-check","reason":"Do the cheapest targeted verification first instead of buying a larger report too early.","path":"/api/source-check","toolName":"check_source_claim","price":"$0.05"}],"buyingLadder":[{"endpoint":"opportunity-check","path":"/api/opportunity-check","toolName":"check_opportunity","title":"Opportunity Check","price":"$0.01","summary":"Cheap front-door screen for deciding whether a target or topic deserves more spend.","whenToUse":"Use this when you are unsure whether a target or claim deserves more paid work.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when you already know the blocker and need a company snapshot, vendor review, claim check, lead brief, or premium diligence map."},{"endpoint":"research-brief","path":"/api/research-brief","toolName":"create_research_brief","title":"Research Brief","price":"$0.05","summary":"General structured research memo for a target, theme, or decision that needs more shape.","whenToUse":"Use this when the buyer needs general structured research and the next step is still open-ended.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when one company, one vendor, one claim, or one lead is already the clear focus."},{"endpoint":"company-intel","path":"/api/company-intel","toolName":"create_company_intel","title":"Company Intel","price":"$0.05","summary":"Quick company snapshot for trust, operating posture, and commercial signal.","whenToUse":"Use this for a quick company snapshot before outreach, approval, or a deeper trust review.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when the blocker is a single claim, a vendor-control question, or a decision that hinges on missing proof."},{"endpoint":"source-check","path":"/api/source-check","toolName":"check_source_claim","title":"Source Check","price":"$0.05","summary":"Targeted claim check for one source, proof point, or statement.","whenToUse":"Use this when one claim or source is the blocker and you want the cheapest focused check first.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when you need a broader company, vendor, lead, or general research view."},{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","toolName":"assess_vendor_risk","title":"Vendor Risk","price":"$0.05","summary":"First-pass vendor trust review before a pilot, procurement step, or partnership approval.","whenToUse":"Use this before a pilot, procurement review, partnership decision, or vendor approval.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when you only need a cheap initial screen or when one source claim is the only blocker."},{"endpoint":"deep-diligence","path":"/api/deep-diligence","toolName":"create_deep_diligence_report","title":"Deep Diligence","price":"$0.50","summary":"Premium Deep Diligence Plan for serious trust decisions where missing evidence could change the outcome.","whenToUse":"Use this when missing evidence could change a real decision and the buyer needs a structured verification map.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this as legal diligence, investment diligence, compliance approval, or a claim that external facts were independently verified."},{"endpoint":"lead-brief","path":"/api/lead-brief","toolName":"create_lead_brief","title":"Lead Brief","price":"$0.05","summary":"Structured lead qualification brief before outreach or account escalation.","whenToUse":"Use this before outreach when the buyer wants a tighter account view and a clearer first message.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when the main question is vendor approval, claim verification, or broader market research."}],"workflows":[{"title":"Vendor approval flow","outcome":"Move from uncertainty to a trust decision without buying the expensive report too early.","steps":[{"endpoint":"opportunity-check","path":"/api/opportunity-check","toolName":"check_opportunity","price":"$0.01"},{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","toolName":"assess_vendor_risk","price":"$0.05"},{"endpoint":"deep-diligence","path":"/api/deep-diligence","toolName":"create_deep_diligence_report","price":"$0.50"}]},{"title":"Account qualification flow","outcome":"Turn a named company into a clearer outreach or diligence path.","steps":[{"endpoint":"company-intel","path":"/api/company-intel","toolName":"create_company_intel","price":"$0.05"},{"endpoint":"lead-brief","path":"/api/lead-brief","toolName":"create_lead_brief","price":"$0.05"},{"endpoint":"source-check","path":"/api/source-check","toolName":"check_source_claim","price":"$0.05"}]},{"title":"Claim-to-proof flow","outcome":"Test a shaky statement first, then widen the work only if it still matters.","steps":[{"endpoint":"source-check","path":"/api/source-check","toolName":"check_source_claim","price":"$0.05"},{"endpoint":"company-intel","path":"/api/company-intel","toolName":"create_company_intel","price":"$0.05"},{"endpoint":"deep-diligence","path":"/api/deep-diligence","toolName":"create_deep_diligence_report","price":"$0.50"}]}]},"launchProof":{"liveUrl":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app","sellerWallet":"0x83cE8ec409Ef94F7d909ecDCd8cC578741b0231D","transactionHash":"0x1c4600cd5963ba29a559e8ce611180ed2b9c5524fd5a50d19af4f223d12d4713","testedEndpoint":"POST /api/company-intel","network":"eip155:8453","facilitator":"https://api.cdp.coinbase.com/platform/v2/x402","paidTestDate":"2026-04-20","passedChecks":["Unpaid request returned HTTP 402.","Paid request returned HTTP 200 with structured JSON.","USDC settled to the seller wallet on Base mainnet.","Merchant and Bazaar discovery became visible after the paid request."],"releaseTag":"v1.0-mainnet-paid-discovery-confirmed","transactionUrl":"https://basescan.org/tx/0x1c4600cd5963ba29a559e8ce611180ed2b9c5524fd5a50d19af4f223d12d4713","discoveryVisible":true},"pricing":{"default":"$0.05","endpoints":{"/api/opportunity-check":"$0.01","/api/research-brief":"$0.05","/api/company-intel":"$0.05","/api/source-check":"$0.05","/api/vendor-risk":"$0.05","/api/deep-diligence":"$0.50","/api/lead-brief":"$0.05"}},"networks":{"testnet":{"network":"eip155:84532","facilitator":"https://x402.org/facilitator"},"production":{"network":"eip155:8453","facilitator":"https://api.cdp.coinbase.com/platform/v2/x402"},"configured":{"network":"eip155:8453","facilitator":"https://api.cdp.coinbase.com/platform/v2/x402"}},"deployment":{"mode":"paid","x402Enabled":true,"statusPath":"/status","healthPath":"/health","testerPath":"/tester","dashboardPath":"/dashboard","mcpCommand":"npm run mcp"},"testerProgram":{"path":"/tester","sourceCodes":["warm-technical","x402-builder","mcp-builder","base-builder","manual-dm"],"whyInvited":["You are being invited because this service is already live on Base mainnet and the next job is controlled usability testing, not payment infrastructure testing.","The fastest useful signal is whether the route ladder, docs, and payment handoff are clear enough for a technical buyer to finish a first purchase without help.","The most valuable early feedback is where you got confused, hesitated, or felt the product promise was unclear."],"fastestPath":["Start with POST /api/opportunity-check at $0.01 to see the lightest-weight trust screen.","If the target still looks worth attention, escalate to POST /api/company-intel or POST /api/vendor-risk at $0.05.","Only buy POST /api/deep-diligence when the decision is serious enough that missing evidence could change the outcome.","Inspect /docs.json before you buy so you can see the exact request and response shape.","Helpful feedback: tell us where the docs, pricing ladder, or payment handoff felt unclear."],"inspectDocsPath":"/docs.json","paymentFlow":["Send an unpaid request to a protected POST route and expect HTTP 402.","Use the payment requirements in that challenge to retry with x402 on Base mainnet.","Receive HTTP 200 with structured JSON after settlement succeeds."],"payloads":[{"endpoint":"opportunity-check","title":"Opportunity Check","method":"POST","path":"/api/opportunity-check","price":"$0.01","payload":{"subject":"Agent trust scoring for crypto vendors","buyer":"Crypto fund operator","marketType":"vendor","geography":"United States","goal":"Decide whether this topic is strong enough to package into a deeper diligence offer.","knownSignals":["Operators keep asking for a faster first-pass trust screen before pilots","Funds want a lightweight way to compare agent vendors before deeper diligence"],"constraints":["Keep the first offer lightweight","Do not assume the buyer already trusts agent vendors"]}},{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","method":"POST","path":"/api/company-intel","price":"$0.05","payload":{"companyName":"Alpine Foods","website":"https://example.com","industry":"Food distribution","geography":"United States","researchFocus":"growth","knownClaims":["Regional specialty food distributor","Expanding private-label program"],"knownSignals":["Hiring for operations and sales","Launching new product categories"],"questions":["How concentrated is demand around a few buyers?","What trust signals matter most to partners?"]}},{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","method":"POST","path":"/api/vendor-risk","price":"$0.05","payload":{"vendorName":"Northwind AI","website":"https://example.com","serviceCategory":"AI workflow automation","useCase":"Automate intake triage and case routing for an operations team.","dataSensitivity":"high","criticality":"high","geography":"United States","knownControls":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","SSO and role-based access controls"],"knownConcerns":["No published uptime history","Third-party model dependency"],"questions":["What is the rollback plan if the workflow misroutes tasks?"]}}],"feedback":{"path":"/api/feedback","fields":["routeTested","clarityScore","outputValueScore","paymentFrictionScore","source","testerType","wouldUseAgain","biggestConfusion","requestedImprovement","comment"],"note":"Feedback is stored privately and exposed publicly only as aggregate metrics. Wallet address is not required, and raw comments are never shown on public pages."},"usefulFeedback":["Which route you tested first and why you chose it.","Whether the price ladder felt intuitive or whether you were unsure when to escalate.","Whether the 402 challenge and paid retry flow felt obvious or confusing.","Whether the output was clear enough to use in an agent workflow without manual rewriting.","The single biggest confusion point that would have made you stop or bounce."]},"forAgents":{"steps":["Discover the service in Bazaar or call the public URL directly.","Inspect /docs.json to read schemas, pricing, tool names, and example payloads.","Send an unpaid POST to a protected route and read the HTTP 402 payment requirements.","Retry the same request with x402 on Base mainnet and pay the listed route price starting at $0.01 USDC.","Receive structured JSON with confidence, risks, opportunities, next actions, questions, and source attribution."],"outputShape":["summary","confidence","risks","opportunities","nextActions","questions","sourceAttribution","commercial"]},"trustAndSafety":["This service does not provide financial, legal, tax, compliance, or investment advice.","Outputs are first-pass intelligence meant to speed up research, not replace human verification.","Buyers should verify important claims, counterparties, vendors, and operational assumptions before making high-stakes decisions.","Deep Diligence is a decision-prep report, not a final legal, financial, compliance, or investment opinion."],"changelog":[{"version":"1.0.0","date":"2026-04-20","entries":["Production x402 paid flow confirmed on Base mainnet.","Bazaar and merchant discovery confirmed after a successful paid request.","Six paid endpoints were confirmed live at launch, including a $0.01 front-door opportunity check."]},{"version":"1.1.0","date":"2026-04-20","releaseTag":"v1.1-privacy-positioning-hardening","entries":["Added the premium Deep Diligence route at $0.50 while keeping the working Base mainnet x402 payment setup unchanged.","Hardened the public dashboard and docs so they expose aggregate-only metrics and no buyer-level history.","Tightened the product positioning around trust and diligence and reframed Deep Diligence as a decision-prep map."]}],"showcaseExamples":[{"id":"opportunity-check","title":"Opportunity Check","toolName":"check_opportunity","method":"POST","path":"/api/opportunity-check","price":"$0.01","scenario":"Use this when an agent needs a cheap yes-or-no screen before committing to a full brief, company read, or risk review.","outcome":"The response returns a pass/watch/skip verdict, the likely buyer, the trust question, the fastest proof path, and the best next paid product.","exampleRequest":{"subject":"Agent trust scoring for crypto vendors","buyer":"Crypto fund operator","marketType":"vendor","geography":"United States","goal":"Decide whether this topic is strong enough to package into a deeper diligence offer.","knownSignals":["Operators keep asking for a faster first-pass trust screen before pilots","Funds want a lightweight way to compare agent vendors before deeper diligence"],"constraints":["Keep the first offer lightweight","Do not assume the buyer already trusts agent vendors"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"c6d33af8-5a3b-4018-9b56-30f8b9dd2c91","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:11:00.000Z","endpoint":"opportunity-check","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.01","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"subject":"Agent trust scoring for crypto vendors","buyer":"Crypto fund operator","marketType":"vendor","geography":"United States","goal":"Decide whether this topic is strong enough to package into a deeper diligence offer.","knownSignals":["Operators keep asking for a faster first-pass trust screen before pilots","Funds want a lightweight way to compare agent vendors before deeper diligence"],"constraints":["Keep the first offer lightweight","Do not assume the buyer already trusts agent vendors"]},"summary":"This looks like a promising entry-point offer because the buyer pain is concrete, the trust problem is obvious, and the topic can escalate cleanly into a deeper diligence product if the first signal holds up.","confidence":{"score":0.74,"label":"medium","rationale":["The request names a buyer, market type, geography, and a concrete packaging goal.","Known signals point to repeat demand instead of a purely speculative idea."]},"risks":["The topic may sound urgent, but buyers might still want proof that the trust problem is expensive enough to pay for.","A lightweight front-door offer can attract curiosity clicks if the next paid step is not clear and specific."],"opportunities":["This is cheap enough to convert uncertain buyers without forcing them into a full brief immediately.","The topic routes naturally into a higher-value vendor diligence workflow if the first screen lands."],"nextActions":["Test whether buyers want a fast score, a short rationale, or a direct escalation recommendation first.","Ask one real buyer what proof would make them pay for the next, deeper step.","Track which market types convert from this cheap screen into bigger products."],"questions":["What would make a buyer pay for a deeper follow-up right after this screen?","Is the strongest demand tied to one named vendor, one company, or a broader market category?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Known request signals","url":null,"relevance":"Initial buyer signal","note":"Use the signals supplied in the request as the first evidence of urgency and packaging fit."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Follow-up buyer interviews or repeated paid requests","url":null,"relevance":"Conversion validation","note":"Use repeat purchase behavior or direct buyer feedback to validate whether the cheap screen deserves to stay in the ladder."}],"commercial":{"stage":"entry","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["This is the lowest-friction entry product, so the main job is deciding whether the topic deserves deeper paid work.","The next offer should point directly to the first serious diligence or research product, not another vague idea screen."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"The topic is already framed as a vendor trust problem, so the clean next move is a structured risk review.","suggestedUse":"Use this when the cheap screen says the vendor question is real enough to pressure-test properly."},{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"If the opportunity centers on one company, the next step is understanding the operator behind the pitch.","suggestedUse":"Run this when you need a fuller operating and trust view of the company behind the topic."},{"endpoint":"research-brief","title":"Research Brief","path":"/api/research-brief","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"If the topic looks bigger than one vendor, turn the screen into a fuller market brief.","suggestedUse":"Use this when the signal is real but still needs market framing before action."}]},"screen":{"verdict":"pass","rationale":"The request is specific enough to price cheaply, and it has a clear escalation path into vendor diligence if the first signal converts.","likelyBuyer":"Crypto fund operator","urgency":"Operators are already asking for a faster first-pass trust screen before deeper vendor review.","trustQuestion":"Will a buyer trust a lightweight signal enough to pay for a full vendor risk review next?","fastestProof":"Sell the cheap screen first, then measure whether buyers immediately escalate into a vendor-focused follow-up.","bestNextProduct":"vendor-risk"}}},{"id":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","toolName":"create_company_intel","method":"POST","path":"/api/company-intel","price":"$0.05","scenario":"Use this when an agent needs a fast trust-and-growth read on a company before spending time on deeper research.","outcome":"The response frames the company posture, likely buyer motion, visible trust signals, and the follow-up checks that matter most.","exampleRequest":{"companyName":"Alpine Foods","website":"https://example.com","industry":"Food distribution","geography":"United States","researchFocus":"growth","knownClaims":["Regional specialty food distributor","Expanding private-label program"],"knownSignals":["Hiring for operations and sales","Launching new product categories"],"questions":["How concentrated is demand around a few buyers?","What trust signals matter most to partners?"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"0f8f6988-dcaa-4dd7-9aef-4308b65bf3c7","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:05:00.000Z","endpoint":"company-intel","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.05","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"companyName":"Alpine Foods","website":"https://example.com","industry":"Food distribution","geography":"United States","researchFocus":"growth","knownClaims":["Regional specialty food distributor","Expanding private-label program"],"knownSignals":["Hiring for operations and sales","Launching new product categories"],"questions":["How concentrated is demand around a few buyers?","What trust signals matter most to partners?"]},"summary":"Alpine Foods looks like a growth-stage food distribution business where commercial momentum depends on partner trust, category expansion discipline, and operational execution more than pure brand awareness.","confidence":{"score":0.76,"label":"high","rationale":["The request includes a company name, website, industry, geography, and explicit growth focus.","Known claims and signals provide enough framing for a first-pass operating view."]},"risks":["Expansion into new categories can stretch fulfillment quality before revenue diversification pays off.","A trust-led sales motion may depend on references, proof of service levels, and margin discipline."],"opportunities":["Private-label growth can create margin expansion if buyer trust is already strong.","Operational hiring may indicate enough demand to justify deeper diligence into execution capacity."],"nextActions":["Verify concentration risk across customers, product lines, and regions.","Check whether growth claims are supported by hiring patterns, launches, or partner announcements.","Test whether the website and public messaging match the actual buyer motion."],"questions":["How concentrated is demand around a few buyers?","What trust signals matter most to partners?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Company website","url":"https://example.com","relevance":"Primary positioning source","note":"Use the official site to compare stated capabilities against external signals."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Partner, hiring, and launch signals","url":null,"relevance":"Momentum validation","note":"Use public job postings, announcements, and partner references to validate growth posture."}],"commercial":{"stage":"core","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Company-level interest often turns into a trust check before a pilot or partnership decision.","suggestedUse":"Use this on the same company if the next question is whether it is safe enough to trust."},{"endpoint":"lead-brief","title":"Lead Brief","path":"/api/lead-brief","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Once the operator and motion are clear, turn the research into a concrete buyer-facing brief.","suggestedUse":"Use this when you want the opening angle and likely objections for outreach."},{"endpoint":"source-check","title":"Source Check","path":"/api/source-check","stage":"entry","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A low-cost way to pressure-test the strongest public claim before deeper diligence.","suggestedUse":"Run this on one claim that would change the buying decision if it proved false."}]},"company":{"canonicalName":"Alpine Foods","website":"https://example.com","industryFocus":"Food distribution","geographyFocus":"United States","posture":"Expansion-stage operator balancing category growth with fulfillment credibility.","likelyBuyerMotion":"Trust-first commercial motion where proof of supply reliability matters more than novelty."},"signals":{"demandSignals":["Hiring for operations and sales","Launching new product categories"],"trustSignals":["Regional specialty food distributor","Expanding private-label program"],"watchItems":["Margin pressure from category expansion","Execution strain if demand outpaces operations"]}}},{"id":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","toolName":"assess_vendor_risk","method":"POST","path":"/api/vendor-risk","price":"$0.05","scenario":"Use this when an agent needs a first-pass operational and control review before recommending a rollout.","outcome":"The response scores risk, highlights weak proof areas, and suggests the next diligence questions before approval.","exampleRequest":{"vendorName":"Northwind AI","website":"https://example.com","serviceCategory":"AI workflow automation","useCase":"Automate intake triage and case routing for an operations team.","dataSensitivity":"high","criticality":"high","geography":"United States","knownControls":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","SSO and role-based access controls"],"knownConcerns":["No published uptime history","Third-party model dependency"],"questions":["What is the rollback plan if the workflow misroutes tasks?"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"5be526a9-1bf2-4a85-b726-08b9011b22f5","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:12:00.000Z","endpoint":"vendor-risk","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.05","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"vendorName":"Northwind AI","website":"https://example.com","serviceCategory":"AI workflow automation","useCase":"Automate intake triage and case routing for an operations team.","dataSensitivity":"high","criticality":"high","geography":"United States","knownControls":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","SSO and role-based access controls"],"knownConcerns":["No published uptime history","Third-party model dependency"],"questions":["What is the rollback plan if the workflow misroutes tasks?"]},"summary":"Northwind AI looks usable for workflow acceleration, but the combination of high-sensitivity data, third-party model dependency, and unclear rollback history pushes the vendor into an elevated-risk bucket.","confidence":{"score":0.8,"label":"high","rationale":["The request includes service category, use case, criticality, data sensitivity, controls, and known concerns.","That gives enough detail for a structured first-pass risk posture."]},"risks":["High-sensitivity workflows raise the bar for access controls, auditability, and incident response proof.","Third-party model dependency can break reliability assumptions if upstream behavior changes.","Missing uptime history weakens confidence for a critical workflow rollout."],"opportunities":["Claimed SSO and role-based controls suggest the vendor may already support enterprise access patterns.","If rollback and human-review controls are strong, the workflow can start with limited operational blast radius."],"nextActions":["Request security documentation, uptime history, and model-governance details.","Test rollback and human-override controls in a pilot environment.","Clarify which customer data reaches third-party systems and under what retention terms."],"questions":["What is the rollback plan if the workflow misroutes tasks?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Vendor website","url":"https://example.com","relevance":"Primary vendor source","note":"Use the vendor site and trust center as the first proof layer, then compare against buyer evidence."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Security and reliability artifacts","url":null,"relevance":"Control validation","note":"Ask for audit reports, uptime data, and architecture documents that match the named controls."}],"commercial":{"stage":"expansion","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"source-check","title":"Source Check","path":"/api/source-check","stage":"entry","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A cheap claim check can validate the one proof point that matters most before a final yes or no.","suggestedUse":"Use this on the strongest vendor claim that still feels unproven."},{"endpoint":"lead-brief","title":"Lead Brief","path":"/api/lead-brief","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Once the risk picture is clear, the next step is arming the operator-facing conversation.","suggestedUse":"Use this if you need a tight buyer-specific follow-up after diligence clears."},{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Risk posture is easier to interpret when paired with a view of how the company actually sells and operates.","suggestedUse":"Use this if you still need a cleaner view of the company itself."}]},"rating":{"level":"elevated","score":72,"rationale":"Controls appear plausible, but criticality and data sensitivity are high relative to the unverified operational proof."},"domains":{"security":"Moderate. Claimed enterprise controls help, but proof of enforcement is still needed.","compliance":"Elevated. Sensitive workflows can trigger policy, retention, and third-party review requirements.","operational":"High. Critical workflow automation needs rollback and exception handling before broad rollout.","financial":"Moderate. The main risk is failed deployment or vendor dependence rather than immediate balance-sheet exposure.","dependency":"High. Model and infrastructure dependency need explicit fallback plans."}}},{"id":"deep-diligence","title":"Deep Diligence","toolName":"create_deep_diligence_report","method":"POST","path":"/api/deep-diligence","price":"$0.50","scenario":"Use this when an agent needs more than a quick screen and wants a structured proof map before a meaningful trust decision.","outcome":"The response separates what was provided from what was not verified, then returns trust signals, risk flags, missing evidence, recommended verification sources, and next actions.","exampleRequest":{"subject":"Northwind AI","subjectType":"vendor","website":"https://example.com","geography":"United States","industry":"AI workflow automation","objective":"Decide whether this vendor deserves a serious trust review before procurement or pilot planning.","knownClaims":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","Enterprise-ready deployment posture"],"knownSignals":["No public uptime history","Third-party model dependency","Growing enterprise go-to-market motion"],"questions":["Which missing proof would most change the trust decision for this vendor?"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"9183d1b7-f6f8-41eb-a6d6-6c74eb2d3af3","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:13:00.000Z","endpoint":"deep-diligence","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.50","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"subject":"Northwind AI","subjectType":"vendor","website":"https://example.com","geography":"United States","industry":"AI workflow automation","objective":"Decide whether this vendor deserves a serious trust review before procurement or pilot planning.","knownClaims":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","Enterprise-ready deployment posture"],"knownSignals":["No public uptime history","Third-party model dependency","Growing enterprise go-to-market motion"],"questions":["Which missing proof would most change the trust decision for this vendor?"]},"summary":"Northwind AI needs a structured decision-prep map because the trust decision still depends on proof gaps, missing evidence, and verification steps that were not resolved by the supplied information alone.","confidence":{"score":0.83,"label":"high","rationale":["The request names the subject type, website, geography, industry, objective, claims, and signals.","That gives enough structure for a serious first-pass diligence map rather than a generic summary."]},"risks":["Enterprise-ready positioning can outrun the actual maturity of control evidence or rollback planning.","Third-party model dependency may create reliability and governance risk that marketing language will not surface cleanly.","No public uptime history weakens confidence in the operating story."],"opportunities":["The subject is specific enough to turn into a concrete proof checklist instead of a vague diligence memo.","Named claims and signals make it easier to focus manual verification on the handful of facts that matter most."],"nextActions":["Request proof for the claimed controls and current uptime or incident history.","Validate how much customer data or operational dependency reaches third-party systems.","Treat missing rollback, governance, or audit evidence as blockers until they are narrowed."],"questions":["Which missing proof would most change the trust decision for this vendor?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"First-party source","url":"https://example.com","relevance":"Primary proof surface","note":"This source was provided in the request. It is a starting point for review, not proof that the claims were independently verified."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Independent corroboration set","url":null,"relevance":"Trust validation","note":"These are recommended next sources to check. They were not retrieved or independently verified by this example response."}],"commercial":{"stage":"expansion","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples.","This is the premium trust product, so the next offer should narrow the final blocking question instead of restarting the research."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A structured risk snapshot is the fastest follow-up when deep diligence surfaces a control or rollout concern that still needs clearer framing.","suggestedUse":"Use this when the buyer now needs a concise risk memo for approval or operator review."},{"endpoint":"source-check","title":"Source Check","path":"/api/source-check","stage":"entry","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A claim check is the cheapest way to settle the single proof point that still feels shaky after the larger review.","suggestedUse":"Run this on the one claim or source that most affects the decision."},{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A broader company view helps explain how the diligence findings map back to the subject's operating posture.","suggestedUse":"Use this if you need a cleaner operating snapshot after the premium diligence pass."}]},"report":{"executiveSummary":"Northwind AI may deserve serious diligence, but the trust decision should stay open until control evidence, uptime proof, and dependency handling are checked directly.","subjectProfile":{"name":"Northwind AI","type":"vendor","website":"https://example.com","geography":"United States","industry":"AI workflow automation","operatingContext":"Vendor-level diligence where control evidence, reliability, and delivery risk matter before approval or pilot."},"trustSignals":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","Enterprise-ready deployment posture","Growing enterprise go-to-market motion","A first-party website or source is available for direct verification.","The diligence objective is clearly stated, which narrows the verification path."],"riskFlags":["Important claims are present, but the request does not prove them on its own.","Signals may indicate momentum, but they do not confirm durable trust or operating quality.","Operational or control gaps can stay hidden until a pilot or incident forces them into view.","Missing evidence can make a subject appear stronger than it really is if the buyer relies on positioning alone."],"missingEvidence":["Independent proof for the named claims","Security, uptime, and rollback evidence","Time-bounded proof that the most important signals are current"],"whatWasProvided":["Subject type, website, geography, industry, objective, known claims, and known signals were supplied by the buyer.","The response used the provided website as the first-party surface to review later."],"whatWasNotVerified":["The claimed controls and deployment posture were not independently verified by this response.","No audit report, uptime history, or customer corroboration was retrieved in this example."],"recommendedVerificationSources":["Security documentation, uptime history, and trust center materials","Customer references and implementation evidence","Official first-party materials, docs, or trust pages","Independent references such as customer evidence, audits, interviews, or third-party reporting","Evidence that ties claims to current operations instead of old or promotional material"]}}},{"id":"lead-brief","title":"Lead Brief","toolName":"create_lead_brief","method":"POST","path":"/api/lead-brief","price":"$0.05","scenario":"Use this when an agent wants to decide whether a prospect is worth attention and what message frame is most likely to land.","outcome":"The response returns fit, likely pains, objections, buying signals, and next actions for sales or operator workflows.","exampleRequest":{"companyName":"Harbor Ops","website":"https://example.com","contactName":"Avery Stone","role":"VP of Operations","industry":"Maritime logistics","geography":"United States","painHypothesis":"Manual vessel-status updates create avoidable coordination delays.","offer":"Agentic operations desk for status monitoring and follow-up drafting.","knownSignals":["Hiring coordinators","Publicly discussing workflow automation","Expanding into new ports"],"questions":["What business trigger makes this lead worth prioritizing this quarter?"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"0d1f8aef-6d1a-4bd8-8dd6-c6058a11333b","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:14:00.000Z","endpoint":"lead-brief","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.05","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"companyName":"Harbor Ops","website":"https://example.com","contactName":"Avery Stone","role":"VP of Operations","industry":"Maritime logistics","geography":"United States","painHypothesis":"Manual vessel-status updates create avoidable coordination delays.","offer":"Agentic operations desk for status monitoring and follow-up drafting.","knownSignals":["Hiring coordinators","Publicly discussing workflow automation","Expanding into new ports"],"questions":["What business trigger makes this lead worth prioritizing this quarter?"]},"summary":"Harbor Ops looks like a strong operational-efficiency lead because the company is expanding while public signals suggest workflow strain, and the target contact likely owns the pain directly.","confidence":{"score":0.78,"label":"high","rationale":["The request names a company, contact role, pain hypothesis, offer, and several commercial signals.","That gives enough structure for an account-specific outreach hypothesis."]},"risks":["The pain hypothesis may be directionally right but still low-priority if there is no near-term service disruption.","Operational leaders may resist automation claims unless the rollout path is low-friction and reversible."],"opportunities":["Expansion into new ports can magnify coordination pain and make workflow automation newly urgent.","A VP of Operations is likely close enough to the process to validate pain quickly."],"nextActions":["Verify whether the company is actively scaling the exact workflow named in the hypothesis.","Tailor the first message around delay reduction, not generic AI productivity.","Prepare one low-risk pilot example that fits a VP of Operations decision frame."],"questions":["What business trigger makes this lead worth prioritizing this quarter?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Company website","url":"https://example.com","relevance":"Account framing","note":"Use the company site to confirm operating model, expansion narrative, and contact relevance."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Public growth and workflow signals","url":null,"relevance":"Prioritization","note":"Validate hiring, expansion, and process-change signals before outreach."}],"commercial":{"stage":"expansion","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples.","This is already close to a sales action, so the next product should strengthen trust or sharpen one claim before outreach."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A lead brief is stronger when paired with a fuller read on the account and its operating posture.","suggestedUse":"Use this if you want a cleaner account map before sending the first message."},{"endpoint":"source-check","title":"Source Check","path":"/api/source-check","stage":"entry","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Validate one high-impact claim before you use it in outreach.","suggestedUse":"Run this on the proof point you plan to cite to the buyer."},{"endpoint":"research-brief","title":"Research Brief","path":"/api/research-brief","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"If the account points to a bigger market theme, expand it into a broader research plan.","suggestedUse":"Use this when the account-level insight should turn into a repeatable market thesis."}]},"lead":{"companyName":"Harbor Ops","contactName":"Avery Stone","role":"VP of Operations","industry":"Maritime logistics","geography":"United States","fit":"strong"},"brief":{"openingAngle":"Frame the outreach around avoidable coordination delays during expansion, not around AI as a category.","valueHypothesis":"If the team is scaling across more ports, a monitoring and follow-up desk could reduce manual status chasing and escalation lag.","likelyPainPoints":["Manual status updates across fragmented systems","Escalation delays when coordinators juggle too many exceptions","Growth forcing more work through the same operating headcount"],"objectionWatchlist":["Fear of workflow disruption","Need for clear human override","Skepticism about data accuracy or integration effort"],"buyingSignals":["Hiring coordinators","Publicly discussing workflow automation","Expanding into new ports"]}}}],"mcp":{"transport":"stdio","tools":[{"name":"check_opportunity","description":"Cheap front-door screen for deciding whether a target or topic deserves more spend.","path":"/api/opportunity-check"},{"name":"create_research_brief","description":"General structured research memo for a target, theme, or decision that needs more shape.","path":"/api/research-brief"},{"name":"create_company_intel","description":"Quick company snapshot for trust, operating posture, and commercial signal.","path":"/api/company-intel"},{"name":"check_source_claim","description":"Targeted claim check for one source, proof point, or statement.","path":"/api/source-check"},{"name":"assess_vendor_risk","description":"First-pass vendor trust review before a pilot, procurement step, or partnership approval.","path":"/api/vendor-risk"},{"name":"create_deep_diligence_report","description":"Premium Deep Diligence Plan for serious trust decisions where missing evidence could change the outcome.","path":"/api/deep-diligence"},{"name":"create_lead_brief","description":"Structured lead qualification brief before outreach or account escalation.","path":"/api/lead-brief"}]},"endpoints":[{"id":"opportunity-check","title":"Opportunity Check","method":"POST","path":"/api/opportunity-check","description":"Best first buy when an agent is unsure whether a target deserves more diligence. Returns a lightweight pass/watch/skip screen, the trust question, the fastest proof path, and the best next paid product.","price":"$0.01","whenToUse":"Use this when you are unsure whether a target or claim deserves more paid work.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when you already know the blocker and need a company snapshot, vendor review, claim check, lead brief, or premium diligence map.","expectedInput":["subject"],"requestSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"subject":{"type":"string"},"buyer":{"type":"string"},"marketType":{"type":"string","enum":["company","vendor","market","lead","claim","workflow","other"]},"geography":{"type":"string"},"goal":{"type":"string"},"knownSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"constraints":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["subject"]},"responseSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"requestId":{"type":"string"},"createdAt":{"type":"string"},"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"service":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"name":{"type":"string"},"version":{"type":"string"},"x402Enabled":{"type":"boolean"},"network":{"type":["string","null"]},"price":{"type":["string","null"]},"url":{"type":["string","null"]}},"required":["name","version","x402Enabled","network","price","url"]},"input":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"subject":{"type":"string"},"buyer":{"type":"string"},"marketType":{"type":"string","enum":["company","vendor","market","lead","claim","workflow","other"]},"geography":{"type":"string"},"goal":{"type":"string"},"knownSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"constraints":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["subject"]},"summary":{"type":"string"},"confidence":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"score":{"type":"number"},"label":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high"]},"rationale":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["score","label","rationale"]},"risks":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"opportunities":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"nextActions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"sourceAttribution":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"kind":{"type":"string","enum":["provided","recommended"]},"label":{"type":"string"},"url":{"type":["string","null"]},"relevance":{"type":"string"},"note":{"type":"string"}},"required":["kind","label","url","relevance","note"]}},"commercial":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"buyerRelationship":{"type":"string","enum":["new","repeat"]},"notes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedOffers":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"title":{"type":"string"},"path":{"type":"string"},"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"priceUsd":{"type":["string","null"]},"reason":{"type":"string"},"suggestedUse":{"type":"string"}},"required":["endpoint","title","path","stage","priceUsd","reason","suggestedUse"]}}},"required":["stage","buyerRelationship","notes","recommendedOffers"]},"screen":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"verdict":{"type":"string","enum":["pass","watch","skip"]},"rationale":{"type":"string"},"likelyBuyer":{"type":"string"},"urgency":{"type":"string"},"trustQuestion":{"type":"string"},"fastestProof":{"type":"string"},"bestNextProduct":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]}},"required":["verdict","rationale","likelyBuyer","urgency","trustQuestion","fastestProof","bestNextProduct"]}},"required":["requestId","createdAt","endpoint","service","input","summary","confidence","risks","opportunities","nextActions","questions","sourceAttribution","commercial","screen"]},"exampleRequest":{"subject":"Agent trust scoring for crypto vendors","buyer":"Crypto fund operator","marketType":"vendor","geography":"United States","goal":"Decide whether this topic is strong enough to package into a deeper diligence offer.","knownSignals":["Operators keep asking for a faster first-pass trust screen before pilots","Funds want a lightweight way to compare agent vendors before deeper diligence"],"constraints":["Keep the first offer lightweight","Do not assume the buyer already trusts agent vendors"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"c6d33af8-5a3b-4018-9b56-30f8b9dd2c91","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:11:00.000Z","endpoint":"opportunity-check","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.01","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"subject":"Agent trust scoring for crypto vendors","buyer":"Crypto fund operator","marketType":"vendor","geography":"United States","goal":"Decide whether this topic is strong enough to package into a deeper diligence offer.","knownSignals":["Operators keep asking for a faster first-pass trust screen before pilots","Funds want a lightweight way to compare agent vendors before deeper diligence"],"constraints":["Keep the first offer lightweight","Do not assume the buyer already trusts agent vendors"]},"summary":"This looks like a promising entry-point offer because the buyer pain is concrete, the trust problem is obvious, and the topic can escalate cleanly into a deeper diligence product if the first signal holds up.","confidence":{"score":0.74,"label":"medium","rationale":["The request names a buyer, market type, geography, and a concrete packaging goal.","Known signals point to repeat demand instead of a purely speculative idea."]},"risks":["The topic may sound urgent, but buyers might still want proof that the trust problem is expensive enough to pay for.","A lightweight front-door offer can attract curiosity clicks if the next paid step is not clear and specific."],"opportunities":["This is cheap enough to convert uncertain buyers without forcing them into a full brief immediately.","The topic routes naturally into a higher-value vendor diligence workflow if the first screen lands."],"nextActions":["Test whether buyers want a fast score, a short rationale, or a direct escalation recommendation first.","Ask one real buyer what proof would make them pay for the next, deeper step.","Track which market types convert from this cheap screen into bigger products."],"questions":["What would make a buyer pay for a deeper follow-up right after this screen?","Is the strongest demand tied to one named vendor, one company, or a broader market category?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Known request signals","url":null,"relevance":"Initial buyer signal","note":"Use the signals supplied in the request as the first evidence of urgency and packaging fit."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Follow-up buyer interviews or repeated paid requests","url":null,"relevance":"Conversion validation","note":"Use repeat purchase behavior or direct buyer feedback to validate whether the cheap screen deserves to stay in the ladder."}],"commercial":{"stage":"entry","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["This is the lowest-friction entry product, so the main job is deciding whether the topic deserves deeper paid work.","The next offer should point directly to the first serious diligence or research product, not another vague idea screen."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"The topic is already framed as a vendor trust problem, so the clean next move is a structured risk review.","suggestedUse":"Use this when the cheap screen says the vendor question is real enough to pressure-test properly."},{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"If the opportunity centers on one company, the next step is understanding the operator behind the pitch.","suggestedUse":"Run this when you need a fuller operating and trust view of the company behind the topic."},{"endpoint":"research-brief","title":"Research Brief","path":"/api/research-brief","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"If the topic looks bigger than one vendor, turn the screen into a fuller market brief.","suggestedUse":"Use this when the signal is real but still needs market framing before action."}]},"screen":{"verdict":"pass","rationale":"The request is specific enough to price cheaply, and it has a clear escalation path into vendor diligence if the first signal converts.","likelyBuyer":"Crypto fund operator","urgency":"Operators are already asking for a faster first-pass trust screen before deeper vendor review.","trustQuestion":"Will a buyer trust a lightweight signal enough to pay for a full vendor risk review next?","fastestProof":"Sell the cheap screen first, then measure whether buyers immediately escalate into a vendor-focused follow-up.","bestNextProduct":"vendor-risk"}},"toolName":"check_opportunity"},{"id":"research-brief","title":"Research Brief","method":"POST","path":"/api/research-brief","description":"Best when the buyer needs a structured first-pass memo before deciding what to do next. Returns executive framing, working hypotheses, research questions, search queries, interview targets, risks, opportunities, and next actions.","price":"$0.05","whenToUse":"Use this when the buyer needs general structured research and the next step is still open-ended.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when one company, one vendor, one claim, or one lead is already the clear focus.","expectedInput":["subject","objective"],"requestSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"subject":{"type":"string"},"objective":{"type":"string"},"audience":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"timeframe":{"type":"string"},"deliverableFormat":{"type":"string","enum":["memo","brief","market-map","vendor-scan","risk-scan"]},"constraints":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"knownFacts":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"keyQuestions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"competitors":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"stakeholders":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["subject","objective"]},"responseSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"requestId":{"type":"string"},"createdAt":{"type":"string"},"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"service":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"name":{"type":"string"},"version":{"type":"string"},"x402Enabled":{"type":"boolean"},"network":{"type":["string","null"]},"price":{"type":["string","null"]},"url":{"type":["string","null"]}},"required":["name","version","x402Enabled","network","price","url"]},"input":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"subject":{"type":"string"},"objective":{"type":"string"},"audience":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"timeframe":{"type":"string"},"deliverableFormat":{"type":"string","enum":["memo","brief","market-map","vendor-scan","risk-scan"]},"constraints":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"knownFacts":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"keyQuestions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"competitors":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"stakeholders":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["subject","objective"]},"summary":{"type":"string"},"confidence":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"score":{"type":"number"},"label":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high"]},"rationale":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["score","label","rationale"]},"risks":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"opportunities":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"nextActions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"sourceAttribution":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"kind":{"type":"string","enum":["provided","recommended"]},"label":{"type":"string"},"url":{"type":["string","null"]},"relevance":{"type":"string"},"note":{"type":"string"}},"required":["kind","label","url","relevance","note"]}},"commercial":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"buyerRelationship":{"type":"string","enum":["new","repeat"]},"notes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedOffers":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"title":{"type":"string"},"path":{"type":"string"},"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"priceUsd":{"type":["string","null"]},"reason":{"type":"string"},"suggestedUse":{"type":"string"}},"required":["endpoint","title","path","stage","priceUsd","reason","suggestedUse"]}}},"required":["stage","buyerRelationship","notes","recommendedOffers"]},"learning":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"totalRequests":{"type":"number"},"paidRequests":{"type":"number"},"estimatedRevenueUsd":{"type":"string"},"lastRecordedAt":{"type":["string","null"]},"recentSubjects":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"topThemes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"label":{"type":"string"},"count":{"type":"number"}},"required":["label","count"]}},"topAudiences":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"label":{"type":"string"},"count":{"type":"number"}},"required":["label","count"]}},"topGeographies":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"label":{"type":"string"},"count":{"type":"number"}},"required":["label","count"]}},"topDeliverableFormats":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"label":{"type":"string"},"count":{"type":"number"}},"required":["label","count"]}},"guidance":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"currentSubjectRepeatCount":{"type":"number"},"currentAudienceRepeatCount":{"type":"number"},"currentGeographyRepeatCount":{"type":"number"},"currentThemeOverlapCount":{"type":"number"},"matchedThemes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["totalRequests","paidRequests","estimatedRevenueUsd","lastRecordedAt","recentSubjects","topThemes","topAudiences","topGeographies","topDeliverableFormats","guidance","currentSubjectRepeatCount","currentAudienceRepeatCount","currentGeographyRepeatCount","currentThemeOverlapCount","matchedThemes"]},"brief":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"title":{"type":"string"},"executiveSummary":{"type":"string"},"recommendedDeliverable":{"type":"string"},"learnedAdjustments":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"workingHypothesis":{"type":"string"},"assumptions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"researchQuestions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"searchQueries":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedSources":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"interviewTargets":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"outline":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"competitorWatchlist":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["title","executiveSummary","recommendedDeliverable","learnedAdjustments","workingHypothesis","assumptions","researchQuestions","searchQueries","recommendedSources","interviewTargets","outline","competitorWatchlist"]}},"required":["requestId","createdAt","endpoint","service","input","summary","confidence","risks","opportunities","nextActions","questions","sourceAttribution","commercial","learning","brief"]},"exampleRequest":{"subject":"AI scheduling assistants for dental clinics","objective":"Prepare a founder-ready brief that clarifies market demand, buyer priorities, and the main integration risks before a product pitch.","audience":"Seed-stage B2B founder","geography":"United States","timeframe":"Next 12 months","deliverableFormat":"brief","constraints":["Focus on SMB dental practices","Avoid regulated diagnostic claims"],"knownFacts":["Dental offices already use practice management software for calendars and reminders","Missed appointments and front-desk staffing are persistent operational pain points"],"keyQuestions":["Which workflows create enough operational pain to justify paying for automation?","What integrations are mandatory for a clinic to adopt an assistant quickly?"],"competitors":["NexHealth","Weave","Podium"],"stakeholders":["Practice owner","Office manager","Front-desk lead"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"b3e0efcb-6517-4d83-a6ec-0fbab8656b20","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:00:00.000Z","endpoint":"research-brief","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.05","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"subject":"AI scheduling assistants for dental clinics","objective":"Prepare a founder-ready brief that clarifies market demand, buyer priorities, and the main integration risks before a product pitch.","audience":"Seed-stage B2B founder","geography":"United States","timeframe":"Next 12 months","deliverableFormat":"brief","constraints":["Focus on SMB dental practices","Avoid regulated diagnostic claims"],"knownFacts":["Dental offices already use practice management software for calendars and reminders","Missed appointments and front-desk staffing are persistent operational pain points"],"keyQuestions":["Which workflows create enough operational pain to justify paying for automation?","What integrations are mandatory for a clinic to adopt an assistant quickly?"],"competitors":["NexHealth","Weave","Podium"],"stakeholders":["Practice owner","Office manager","Front-desk lead"]},"summary":"This brief frames the market around AI scheduling assistants for dental clinics for a Seed-stage B2B founder, with attention to United States conditions over Next 12 months. The research should test whether automation meaningfully improves appointment fill rate, staff utilization, and patient responsiveness without creating integration drag.","confidence":{"score":0.81,"label":"high","rationale":["The request includes a named buyer, geography, timeframe, and incumbent alternatives.","Known facts and explicit research questions reduce ambiguity in the first pass."]},"risks":["Integration complexity could slow proof-of-value even if buyer interest is strong.","Workflow automation that touches patient communications may raise privacy and consent concerns."],"opportunities":["Missed-appointment reduction is a measurable ROI story that can anchor buyer conversations.","Front-desk staffing pressure creates a near-term pain narrative instead of a generic automation pitch."],"nextActions":["Interview three target operators to rank workflow pain by urgency.","Map the must-have integrations and estimate deployment friction.","Collect competitor pricing and positioning claims into a comparison table."],"questions":["Which workflows create enough operational pain to justify paying for automation?","What integrations are mandatory for a clinic to adopt an assistant quickly?","What proof points would make an office manager trust the assistant in daily use?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"recommended","label":"Practice management platform documentation","url":null,"relevance":"Integration reality check","note":"Use official docs and partner directories to verify must-have system dependencies."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Dental operations benchmark reports","url":null,"relevance":"ROI calibration","note":"Compare staffing ratios, no-show rates, and scheduling throughput benchmarks."}],"commercial":{"stage":"core","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples.","The current brief is a core product, so the next useful step is a higher-conviction diligence or conversion workflow."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"The brief frames the market, but company-level diligence is the fastest next move once a target is identified.","suggestedUse":"Run this on the strongest target company named in the brief."},{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Repeat buyers in this pattern usually need a trust and control read before they spend real money.","suggestedUse":"Use this when a buyer asks whether a vendor is safe enough to pilot."},{"endpoint":"lead-brief","title":"Lead Brief","path":"/api/lead-brief","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Once the target segment is clear, the highest-leverage next step is turning it into a concrete buyer conversation.","suggestedUse":"Run this when you want the first outreach angle for a named operator."}]},"learning":{"totalRequests":12,"paidRequests":9,"estimatedRevenueUsd":"0.45","lastRecordedAt":"2026-04-20T18:00:00.000Z","recentSubjects":[],"topThemes":[{"label":"dental","count":4},{"label":"clinics","count":3},{"label":"scheduling","count":3}],"topAudiences":[{"label":"Seed-stage B2B founder","count":5}],"topGeographies":[{"label":"United States","count":4}],"topDeliverableFormats":[{"label":"brief","count":6}],"guidance":["Synthetic public example: aggregate learning signals are shown, but recent paid request subjects are intentionally omitted.","Aggregate theme patterns can still help buyers understand what kinds of trust and diligence work convert."],"currentSubjectRepeatCount":1,"currentAudienceRepeatCount":2,"currentGeographyRepeatCount":3,"currentThemeOverlapCount":3,"matchedThemes":["dental","clinics","scheduling"]},"brief":{"title":"AI scheduling assistants for dental clinics research brief","executiveSummary":"This brief frames the market around AI scheduling assistants for dental clinics for a Seed-stage B2B founder, with attention to United States conditions over Next 12 months.","recommendedDeliverable":"Founder brief with buyer pain map, market scan, and integration risk summary","learnedAdjustments":["Exact repeat demand suggests packaging this topic as a repeatable offer instead of a one-off brief.","Prior paid demand says Seed-stage B2B founder is a proven buyer profile for this type of request."],"workingHypothesis":"If an assistant reduces front-desk workload while preserving trust, clinics will evaluate it as a revenue-protection tool rather than a generic productivity add-on.","assumptions":["Primary buyer is time-constrained and needs a concise decision memo.","The first release must integrate with existing scheduling systems instead of replacing them."],"researchQuestions":["Which workflows create enough operational pain to justify paying for automation?","What integrations are mandatory for a clinic to adopt an assistant quickly?","What proof points would make an office manager trust the assistant in daily use?"],"searchQueries":["AI scheduling assistants for dental clinics market demand United States","dental clinic scheduling software integration requirements","missed appointment reduction dental offices automation case study"],"recommendedSources":["Practice management platform documentation and partner directories","Dental operations surveys and missed-appointment benchmarks","Competitor websites, pricing pages, demos, and customer stories"],"interviewTargets":["Practice owner","Office manager","Front-desk lead","Implementation partner familiar with dental scheduling software"],"outline":["Market context and why the pain matters now","Buyer jobs-to-be-done and operational bottlenecks","Competitive landscape and positioning gaps","Integration and operational risks","Recommended next experiments"],"competitorWatchlist":["NexHealth","Weave","Podium"]}},"toolName":"create_research_brief"},{"id":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","method":"POST","path":"/api/company-intel","description":"Best when the buyer is screening one account, partner, or target company. Returns posture, signals, risks, opportunities, follow-up questions, and recommended validation steps.","price":"$0.05","whenToUse":"Use this for a quick company snapshot before outreach, approval, or a deeper trust review.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when the blocker is a single claim, a vendor-control question, or a decision that hinges on missing proof.","expectedInput":["companyName"],"requestSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"companyName":{"type":"string"},"website":{"type":"string"},"industry":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"researchFocus":{"type":"string","enum":["overview","competitive","financial","trust","growth"]},"knownClaims":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"knownSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["companyName"]},"responseSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"requestId":{"type":"string"},"createdAt":{"type":"string"},"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"service":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"name":{"type":"string"},"version":{"type":"string"},"x402Enabled":{"type":"boolean"},"network":{"type":["string","null"]},"price":{"type":["string","null"]},"url":{"type":["string","null"]}},"required":["name","version","x402Enabled","network","price","url"]},"input":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"companyName":{"type":"string"},"website":{"type":"string"},"industry":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"researchFocus":{"type":"string","enum":["overview","competitive","financial","trust","growth"]},"knownClaims":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"knownSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["companyName"]},"summary":{"type":"string"},"confidence":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"score":{"type":"number"},"label":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high"]},"rationale":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["score","label","rationale"]},"risks":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"opportunities":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"nextActions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"sourceAttribution":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"kind":{"type":"string","enum":["provided","recommended"]},"label":{"type":"string"},"url":{"type":["string","null"]},"relevance":{"type":"string"},"note":{"type":"string"}},"required":["kind","label","url","relevance","note"]}},"commercial":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"buyerRelationship":{"type":"string","enum":["new","repeat"]},"notes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedOffers":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"title":{"type":"string"},"path":{"type":"string"},"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"priceUsd":{"type":["string","null"]},"reason":{"type":"string"},"suggestedUse":{"type":"string"}},"required":["endpoint","title","path","stage","priceUsd","reason","suggestedUse"]}}},"required":["stage","buyerRelationship","notes","recommendedOffers"]},"company":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"canonicalName":{"type":"string"},"website":{"type":["string","null"]},"industryFocus":{"type":"string"},"geographyFocus":{"type":"string"},"posture":{"type":"string"},"likelyBuyerMotion":{"type":"string"}},"required":["canonicalName","website","industryFocus","geographyFocus","posture","likelyBuyerMotion"]},"signals":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"demandSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"trustSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"watchItems":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["demandSignals","trustSignals","watchItems"]}},"required":["requestId","createdAt","endpoint","service","input","summary","confidence","risks","opportunities","nextActions","questions","sourceAttribution","commercial","company","signals"]},"exampleRequest":{"companyName":"Alpine Foods","website":"https://example.com","industry":"Food distribution","geography":"United States","researchFocus":"growth","knownClaims":["Regional specialty food distributor","Expanding private-label program"],"knownSignals":["Hiring for operations and sales","Launching new product categories"],"questions":["How concentrated is demand around a few buyers?","What trust signals matter most to partners?"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"0f8f6988-dcaa-4dd7-9aef-4308b65bf3c7","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:05:00.000Z","endpoint":"company-intel","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.05","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"companyName":"Alpine Foods","website":"https://example.com","industry":"Food distribution","geography":"United States","researchFocus":"growth","knownClaims":["Regional specialty food distributor","Expanding private-label program"],"knownSignals":["Hiring for operations and sales","Launching new product categories"],"questions":["How concentrated is demand around a few buyers?","What trust signals matter most to partners?"]},"summary":"Alpine Foods looks like a growth-stage food distribution business where commercial momentum depends on partner trust, category expansion discipline, and operational execution more than pure brand awareness.","confidence":{"score":0.76,"label":"high","rationale":["The request includes a company name, website, industry, geography, and explicit growth focus.","Known claims and signals provide enough framing for a first-pass operating view."]},"risks":["Expansion into new categories can stretch fulfillment quality before revenue diversification pays off.","A trust-led sales motion may depend on references, proof of service levels, and margin discipline."],"opportunities":["Private-label growth can create margin expansion if buyer trust is already strong.","Operational hiring may indicate enough demand to justify deeper diligence into execution capacity."],"nextActions":["Verify concentration risk across customers, product lines, and regions.","Check whether growth claims are supported by hiring patterns, launches, or partner announcements.","Test whether the website and public messaging match the actual buyer motion."],"questions":["How concentrated is demand around a few buyers?","What trust signals matter most to partners?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Company website","url":"https://example.com","relevance":"Primary positioning source","note":"Use the official site to compare stated capabilities against external signals."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Partner, hiring, and launch signals","url":null,"relevance":"Momentum validation","note":"Use public job postings, announcements, and partner references to validate growth posture."}],"commercial":{"stage":"core","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Company-level interest often turns into a trust check before a pilot or partnership decision.","suggestedUse":"Use this on the same company if the next question is whether it is safe enough to trust."},{"endpoint":"lead-brief","title":"Lead Brief","path":"/api/lead-brief","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Once the operator and motion are clear, turn the research into a concrete buyer-facing brief.","suggestedUse":"Use this when you want the opening angle and likely objections for outreach."},{"endpoint":"source-check","title":"Source Check","path":"/api/source-check","stage":"entry","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A low-cost way to pressure-test the strongest public claim before deeper diligence.","suggestedUse":"Run this on one claim that would change the buying decision if it proved false."}]},"company":{"canonicalName":"Alpine Foods","website":"https://example.com","industryFocus":"Food distribution","geographyFocus":"United States","posture":"Expansion-stage operator balancing category growth with fulfillment credibility.","likelyBuyerMotion":"Trust-first commercial motion where proof of supply reliability matters more than novelty."},"signals":{"demandSignals":["Hiring for operations and sales","Launching new product categories"],"trustSignals":["Regional specialty food distributor","Expanding private-label program"],"watchItems":["Margin pressure from category expansion","Execution strain if demand outpaces operations"]}},"toolName":"create_company_intel"},{"id":"source-check","title":"Source Check","method":"POST","path":"/api/source-check","description":"Best low-cost follow-up when one proof point still feels shaky. Returns a claim verdict, source-quality notes, corroboration steps, risks, opportunities, and open questions.","price":"$0.05","whenToUse":"Use this when one claim or source is the blocker and you want the cheapest focused check first.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when you need a broader company, vendor, lead, or general research view.","expectedInput":["claim"],"requestSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"claim":{"type":"string"},"sourceUrl":{"type":"string"},"sourceType":{"type":"string","enum":["website","article","social-post","document","wallet","token","other"]},"subject":{"type":"string"},"context":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"validationGoal":{"type":"string","enum":["truthfulness","bias","timeliness","completeness","sales-risk"]}},"required":["claim"]},"responseSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"requestId":{"type":"string"},"createdAt":{"type":"string"},"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"service":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"name":{"type":"string"},"version":{"type":"string"},"x402Enabled":{"type":"boolean"},"network":{"type":["string","null"]},"price":{"type":["string","null"]},"url":{"type":["string","null"]}},"required":["name","version","x402Enabled","network","price","url"]},"input":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"claim":{"type":"string"},"sourceUrl":{"type":"string"},"sourceType":{"type":"string","enum":["website","article","social-post","document","wallet","token","other"]},"subject":{"type":"string"},"context":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"validationGoal":{"type":"string","enum":["truthfulness","bias","timeliness","completeness","sales-risk"]}},"required":["claim"]},"summary":{"type":"string"},"confidence":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"score":{"type":"number"},"label":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high"]},"rationale":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["score","label","rationale"]},"risks":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"opportunities":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"nextActions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"sourceAttribution":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"kind":{"type":"string","enum":["provided","recommended"]},"label":{"type":"string"},"url":{"type":["string","null"]},"relevance":{"type":"string"},"note":{"type":"string"}},"required":["kind","label","url","relevance","note"]}},"commercial":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"buyerRelationship":{"type":"string","enum":["new","repeat"]},"notes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedOffers":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"title":{"type":"string"},"path":{"type":"string"},"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"priceUsd":{"type":["string","null"]},"reason":{"type":"string"},"suggestedUse":{"type":"string"}},"required":["endpoint","title","path","stage","priceUsd","reason","suggestedUse"]}}},"required":["stage","buyerRelationship","notes","recommendedOffers"]},"verdict":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"label":{"type":"string","enum":["substantiated","unclear","risky","promotional"]},"summary":{"type":"string"},"confidenceBasis":{"type":"string"}},"required":["label","summary","confidenceBasis"]},"checks":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"sourceReliability":{"type":"string"},"claimSpecificity":{"type":"string"},"timeliness":{"type":"string"},"corroborationPlan":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"missingEvidence":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["sourceReliability","claimSpecificity","timeliness","corroborationPlan","missingEvidence"]}},"required":["requestId","createdAt","endpoint","service","input","summary","confidence","risks","opportunities","nextActions","questions","sourceAttribution","commercial","verdict","checks"]},"exampleRequest":{"claim":"This vendor integrates natively with every major ERP in under two weeks.","sourceUrl":"https://example.com/claims/erp-integrations","sourceType":"website","subject":"ERP integration claim","context":["Claim appears on a sales page","Buyer is using this for vendor shortlisting"],"validationGoal":"sales-risk"},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"74ab3e7f-af1f-4e70-98f8-e44dff2ddf13","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:10:00.000Z","endpoint":"source-check","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.05","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"claim":"This vendor integrates natively with every major ERP in under two weeks.","sourceUrl":"https://example.com/claims/erp-integrations","sourceType":"website","subject":"ERP integration claim","context":["Claim appears on a sales page","Buyer is using this for vendor shortlisting"],"validationGoal":"sales-risk"},"summary":"The claim reads like a strong sales promise, but it is too absolute to trust without tighter proof on scope, ERP coverage, and real deployment timelines.","confidence":{"score":0.72,"label":"medium","rationale":["A direct claim and source URL are provided, which improves traceability.","The statement still lacks named systems, reference conditions, and measurement criteria."]},"risks":["Absolute language can overstate implementation speed and create procurement friction later.","A buyer may treat this as proven interoperability even if the vendor only supports partial flows."],"opportunities":["If narrowed into named systems and documented scope, the claim could become a strong trust asset.","This is a good candidate for a proof request during vendor diligence."],"nextActions":["Ask for named ERP systems, deployment prerequisites, and exclusions.","Request a customer reference or implementation case study tied to the two-week timeline.","Check whether the claim appears in contracts, docs, or only promotional copy."],"questions":["Which ERP systems are actually covered by the claim?","Does the timeline include data mapping and approval flows?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Claim source","url":"https://example.com/claims/erp-integrations","relevance":"Primary statement under review","note":"Use the originating page as the baseline wording for validation."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Implementation references","url":null,"relevance":"Corroboration","note":"Look for docs, customer stories, or contract language that clarifies scope and timing."}],"commercial":{"stage":"entry","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["This is the entry-level screen, so the next best offer should deepen the work only if the claim is worth chasing."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"If the claim matters, the next step is understanding the company behind it, not just the statement itself.","suggestedUse":"Use this after the first claim check surfaces enough interest to justify broader diligence."},{"endpoint":"research-brief","title":"Research Brief","path":"/api/research-brief","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A broader brief is the next move when one claim reveals a bigger market or buyer question.","suggestedUse":"Use this when you want to turn a one-off check into a structured research plan."},{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"If the claim is central to trust, a formal risk review is the right escalation.","suggestedUse":"Run this when the buying question shifts from truthfulness to operational risk."}]},"verdict":{"label":"unclear","summary":"The claim is directionally plausible but too broad to treat as verified without narrowing evidence.","confidenceBasis":"The statement is traceable, but its scope and proof standard are undefined."},"checks":{"sourceReliability":"Moderate. The source appears to be a first-party marketing claim, which is relevant but biased.","claimSpecificity":"Low. The statement uses absolute wording without naming systems or boundaries.","timeliness":"Unknown. There is not enough context to tell whether the claim reflects the current product.","corroborationPlan":["Compare the claim against implementation docs and API references.","Request named customer examples that match the stated timeline."],"missingEvidence":["Named ERP coverage","Definition of native integration","Evidence for the two-week deployment window"]}},"toolName":"check_source_claim"},{"id":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","method":"POST","path":"/api/vendor-risk","description":"Best when the buyer already knows the vendor and needs a concise trust memo. Returns a risk level, domain-by-domain notes, opportunities, next actions, and diligence questions.","price":"$0.05","whenToUse":"Use this before a pilot, procurement review, partnership decision, or vendor approval.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when you only need a cheap initial screen or when one source claim is the only blocker.","expectedInput":["vendorName","serviceCategory","useCase"],"requestSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"vendorName":{"type":"string"},"website":{"type":"string"},"serviceCategory":{"type":"string"},"useCase":{"type":"string"},"dataSensitivity":{"type":"string","enum":["low","moderate","high","regulated"]},"criticality":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high","mission-critical"]},"geography":{"type":"string"},"knownControls":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"knownConcerns":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["vendorName","serviceCategory","useCase"]},"responseSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"requestId":{"type":"string"},"createdAt":{"type":"string"},"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"service":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"name":{"type":"string"},"version":{"type":"string"},"x402Enabled":{"type":"boolean"},"network":{"type":["string","null"]},"price":{"type":["string","null"]},"url":{"type":["string","null"]}},"required":["name","version","x402Enabled","network","price","url"]},"input":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"vendorName":{"type":"string"},"website":{"type":"string"},"serviceCategory":{"type":"string"},"useCase":{"type":"string"},"dataSensitivity":{"type":"string","enum":["low","moderate","high","regulated"]},"criticality":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high","mission-critical"]},"geography":{"type":"string"},"knownControls":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"knownConcerns":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["vendorName","serviceCategory","useCase"]},"summary":{"type":"string"},"confidence":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"score":{"type":"number"},"label":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high"]},"rationale":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["score","label","rationale"]},"risks":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"opportunities":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"nextActions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"sourceAttribution":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"kind":{"type":"string","enum":["provided","recommended"]},"label":{"type":"string"},"url":{"type":["string","null"]},"relevance":{"type":"string"},"note":{"type":"string"}},"required":["kind","label","url","relevance","note"]}},"commercial":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"buyerRelationship":{"type":"string","enum":["new","repeat"]},"notes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedOffers":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"title":{"type":"string"},"path":{"type":"string"},"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"priceUsd":{"type":["string","null"]},"reason":{"type":"string"},"suggestedUse":{"type":"string"}},"required":["endpoint","title","path","stage","priceUsd","reason","suggestedUse"]}}},"required":["stage","buyerRelationship","notes","recommendedOffers"]},"rating":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"level":{"type":"string","enum":["low","moderate","elevated","high"]},"score":{"type":"number"},"rationale":{"type":"string"}},"required":["level","score","rationale"]},"domains":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"security":{"type":"string"},"compliance":{"type":"string"},"operational":{"type":"string"},"financial":{"type":"string"},"dependency":{"type":"string"}},"required":["security","compliance","operational","financial","dependency"]}},"required":["requestId","createdAt","endpoint","service","input","summary","confidence","risks","opportunities","nextActions","questions","sourceAttribution","commercial","rating","domains"]},"exampleRequest":{"vendorName":"Northwind AI","website":"https://example.com","serviceCategory":"AI workflow automation","useCase":"Automate intake triage and case routing for an operations team.","dataSensitivity":"high","criticality":"high","geography":"United States","knownControls":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","SSO and role-based access controls"],"knownConcerns":["No published uptime history","Third-party model dependency"],"questions":["What is the rollback plan if the workflow misroutes tasks?"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"5be526a9-1bf2-4a85-b726-08b9011b22f5","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:12:00.000Z","endpoint":"vendor-risk","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.05","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"vendorName":"Northwind AI","website":"https://example.com","serviceCategory":"AI workflow automation","useCase":"Automate intake triage and case routing for an operations team.","dataSensitivity":"high","criticality":"high","geography":"United States","knownControls":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","SSO and role-based access controls"],"knownConcerns":["No published uptime history","Third-party model dependency"],"questions":["What is the rollback plan if the workflow misroutes tasks?"]},"summary":"Northwind AI looks usable for workflow acceleration, but the combination of high-sensitivity data, third-party model dependency, and unclear rollback history pushes the vendor into an elevated-risk bucket.","confidence":{"score":0.8,"label":"high","rationale":["The request includes service category, use case, criticality, data sensitivity, controls, and known concerns.","That gives enough detail for a structured first-pass risk posture."]},"risks":["High-sensitivity workflows raise the bar for access controls, auditability, and incident response proof.","Third-party model dependency can break reliability assumptions if upstream behavior changes.","Missing uptime history weakens confidence for a critical workflow rollout."],"opportunities":["Claimed SSO and role-based controls suggest the vendor may already support enterprise access patterns.","If rollback and human-review controls are strong, the workflow can start with limited operational blast radius."],"nextActions":["Request security documentation, uptime history, and model-governance details.","Test rollback and human-override controls in a pilot environment.","Clarify which customer data reaches third-party systems and under what retention terms."],"questions":["What is the rollback plan if the workflow misroutes tasks?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Vendor website","url":"https://example.com","relevance":"Primary vendor source","note":"Use the vendor site and trust center as the first proof layer, then compare against buyer evidence."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Security and reliability artifacts","url":null,"relevance":"Control validation","note":"Ask for audit reports, uptime data, and architecture documents that match the named controls."}],"commercial":{"stage":"expansion","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"source-check","title":"Source Check","path":"/api/source-check","stage":"entry","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A cheap claim check can validate the one proof point that matters most before a final yes or no.","suggestedUse":"Use this on the strongest vendor claim that still feels unproven."},{"endpoint":"lead-brief","title":"Lead Brief","path":"/api/lead-brief","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Once the risk picture is clear, the next step is arming the operator-facing conversation.","suggestedUse":"Use this if you need a tight buyer-specific follow-up after diligence clears."},{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Risk posture is easier to interpret when paired with a view of how the company actually sells and operates.","suggestedUse":"Use this if you still need a cleaner view of the company itself."}]},"rating":{"level":"elevated","score":72,"rationale":"Controls appear plausible, but criticality and data sensitivity are high relative to the unverified operational proof."},"domains":{"security":"Moderate. Claimed enterprise controls help, but proof of enforcement is still needed.","compliance":"Elevated. Sensitive workflows can trigger policy, retention, and third-party review requirements.","operational":"High. Critical workflow automation needs rollback and exception handling before broad rollout.","financial":"Moderate. The main risk is failed deployment or vendor dependence rather than immediate balance-sheet exposure.","dependency":"High. Model and infrastructure dependency need explicit fallback plans."}},"toolName":"assess_vendor_risk"},{"id":"deep-diligence","title":"Deep Diligence","method":"POST","path":"/api/deep-diligence","description":"Best when the buyer needs a decision-prep map before procurement, partnership, or another serious trust decision. Returns an executive summary, subject profile, trust signals, risk flags, what was provided, what was not verified, missing evidence, recommended verification sources, and next actions based on the supplied information.","price":"$0.50","whenToUse":"Use this when missing evidence could change a real decision and the buyer needs a structured verification map.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this as legal diligence, investment diligence, compliance approval, or a claim that external facts were independently verified.","expectedInput":["subject","subjectType"],"requestSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"subject":{"type":"string"},"subjectType":{"type":"string","enum":["company","website","vendor","claim","lead","wallet","token","topic"]},"website":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"industry":{"type":"string"},"objective":{"type":"string"},"knownClaims":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"knownSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["subject","subjectType"]},"responseSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"requestId":{"type":"string"},"createdAt":{"type":"string"},"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"service":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"name":{"type":"string"},"version":{"type":"string"},"x402Enabled":{"type":"boolean"},"network":{"type":["string","null"]},"price":{"type":["string","null"]},"url":{"type":["string","null"]}},"required":["name","version","x402Enabled","network","price","url"]},"input":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"subject":{"type":"string"},"subjectType":{"type":"string","enum":["company","website","vendor","claim","lead","wallet","token","topic"]},"website":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"industry":{"type":"string"},"objective":{"type":"string"},"knownClaims":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"knownSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["subject","subjectType"]},"summary":{"type":"string"},"confidence":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"score":{"type":"number"},"label":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high"]},"rationale":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["score","label","rationale"]},"risks":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"opportunities":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"nextActions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"sourceAttribution":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"kind":{"type":"string","enum":["provided","recommended"]},"label":{"type":"string"},"url":{"type":["string","null"]},"relevance":{"type":"string"},"note":{"type":"string"}},"required":["kind","label","url","relevance","note"]}},"commercial":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"buyerRelationship":{"type":"string","enum":["new","repeat"]},"notes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedOffers":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"title":{"type":"string"},"path":{"type":"string"},"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"priceUsd":{"type":["string","null"]},"reason":{"type":"string"},"suggestedUse":{"type":"string"}},"required":["endpoint","title","path","stage","priceUsd","reason","suggestedUse"]}}},"required":["stage","buyerRelationship","notes","recommendedOffers"]},"report":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"executiveSummary":{"type":"string"},"subjectProfile":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"name":{"type":"string"},"type":{"type":"string","enum":["company","website","vendor","claim","lead","wallet","token","topic"]},"website":{"type":["string","null"]},"geography":{"type":"string"},"industry":{"type":"string"},"operatingContext":{"type":"string"}},"required":["name","type","website","geography","industry","operatingContext"]},"trustSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"riskFlags":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"missingEvidence":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"whatWasProvided":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"whatWasNotVerified":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedVerificationSources":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["executiveSummary","subjectProfile","trustSignals","riskFlags","missingEvidence","whatWasProvided","whatWasNotVerified","recommendedVerificationSources"]}},"required":["requestId","createdAt","endpoint","service","input","summary","confidence","risks","opportunities","nextActions","questions","sourceAttribution","commercial","report"]},"exampleRequest":{"subject":"Northwind AI","subjectType":"vendor","website":"https://example.com","geography":"United States","industry":"AI workflow automation","objective":"Decide whether this vendor deserves a serious trust review before procurement or pilot planning.","knownClaims":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","Enterprise-ready deployment posture"],"knownSignals":["No public uptime history","Third-party model dependency","Growing enterprise go-to-market motion"],"questions":["Which missing proof would most change the trust decision for this vendor?"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"9183d1b7-f6f8-41eb-a6d6-6c74eb2d3af3","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:13:00.000Z","endpoint":"deep-diligence","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.50","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"subject":"Northwind AI","subjectType":"vendor","website":"https://example.com","geography":"United States","industry":"AI workflow automation","objective":"Decide whether this vendor deserves a serious trust review before procurement or pilot planning.","knownClaims":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","Enterprise-ready deployment posture"],"knownSignals":["No public uptime history","Third-party model dependency","Growing enterprise go-to-market motion"],"questions":["Which missing proof would most change the trust decision for this vendor?"]},"summary":"Northwind AI needs a structured decision-prep map because the trust decision still depends on proof gaps, missing evidence, and verification steps that were not resolved by the supplied information alone.","confidence":{"score":0.83,"label":"high","rationale":["The request names the subject type, website, geography, industry, objective, claims, and signals.","That gives enough structure for a serious first-pass diligence map rather than a generic summary."]},"risks":["Enterprise-ready positioning can outrun the actual maturity of control evidence or rollback planning.","Third-party model dependency may create reliability and governance risk that marketing language will not surface cleanly.","No public uptime history weakens confidence in the operating story."],"opportunities":["The subject is specific enough to turn into a concrete proof checklist instead of a vague diligence memo.","Named claims and signals make it easier to focus manual verification on the handful of facts that matter most."],"nextActions":["Request proof for the claimed controls and current uptime or incident history.","Validate how much customer data or operational dependency reaches third-party systems.","Treat missing rollback, governance, or audit evidence as blockers until they are narrowed."],"questions":["Which missing proof would most change the trust decision for this vendor?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"First-party source","url":"https://example.com","relevance":"Primary proof surface","note":"This source was provided in the request. It is a starting point for review, not proof that the claims were independently verified."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Independent corroboration set","url":null,"relevance":"Trust validation","note":"These are recommended next sources to check. They were not retrieved or independently verified by this example response."}],"commercial":{"stage":"expansion","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples.","This is the premium trust product, so the next offer should narrow the final blocking question instead of restarting the research."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"vendor-risk","title":"Vendor Risk","path":"/api/vendor-risk","stage":"expansion","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A structured risk snapshot is the fastest follow-up when deep diligence surfaces a control or rollout concern that still needs clearer framing.","suggestedUse":"Use this when the buyer now needs a concise risk memo for approval or operator review."},{"endpoint":"source-check","title":"Source Check","path":"/api/source-check","stage":"entry","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A claim check is the cheapest way to settle the single proof point that still feels shaky after the larger review.","suggestedUse":"Run this on the one claim or source that most affects the decision."},{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A broader company view helps explain how the diligence findings map back to the subject's operating posture.","suggestedUse":"Use this if you need a cleaner operating snapshot after the premium diligence pass."}]},"report":{"executiveSummary":"Northwind AI may deserve serious diligence, but the trust decision should stay open until control evidence, uptime proof, and dependency handling are checked directly.","subjectProfile":{"name":"Northwind AI","type":"vendor","website":"https://example.com","geography":"United States","industry":"AI workflow automation","operatingContext":"Vendor-level diligence where control evidence, reliability, and delivery risk matter before approval or pilot."},"trustSignals":["SOC 2 Type II claimed","Enterprise-ready deployment posture","Growing enterprise go-to-market motion","A first-party website or source is available for direct verification.","The diligence objective is clearly stated, which narrows the verification path."],"riskFlags":["Important claims are present, but the request does not prove them on its own.","Signals may indicate momentum, but they do not confirm durable trust or operating quality.","Operational or control gaps can stay hidden until a pilot or incident forces them into view.","Missing evidence can make a subject appear stronger than it really is if the buyer relies on positioning alone."],"missingEvidence":["Independent proof for the named claims","Security, uptime, and rollback evidence","Time-bounded proof that the most important signals are current"],"whatWasProvided":["Subject type, website, geography, industry, objective, known claims, and known signals were supplied by the buyer.","The response used the provided website as the first-party surface to review later."],"whatWasNotVerified":["The claimed controls and deployment posture were not independently verified by this response.","No audit report, uptime history, or customer corroboration was retrieved in this example."],"recommendedVerificationSources":["Security documentation, uptime history, and trust center materials","Customer references and implementation evidence","Official first-party materials, docs, or trust pages","Independent references such as customer evidence, audits, interviews, or third-party reporting","Evidence that ties claims to current operations instead of old or promotional material"]}},"toolName":"create_deep_diligence_report"},{"id":"lead-brief","title":"Lead Brief","method":"POST","path":"/api/lead-brief","description":"Best when the buyer already has a target account and wants a sharper first message. Returns fit assessment, opening angle, likely pains, objections, buying signals, risks, opportunities, and next actions.","price":"$0.05","whenToUse":"Use this before outreach when the buyer wants a tighter account view and a clearer first message.","doNotUseWhen":"Do not use this when the main question is vendor approval, claim verification, or broader market research.","expectedInput":["companyName"],"requestSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"companyName":{"type":"string"},"website":{"type":"string"},"contactName":{"type":"string"},"role":{"type":"string"},"industry":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"painHypothesis":{"type":"string"},"offer":{"type":"string"},"knownSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["companyName"]},"responseSchema":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"requestId":{"type":"string"},"createdAt":{"type":"string"},"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"service":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"name":{"type":"string"},"version":{"type":"string"},"x402Enabled":{"type":"boolean"},"network":{"type":["string","null"]},"price":{"type":["string","null"]},"url":{"type":["string","null"]}},"required":["name","version","x402Enabled","network","price","url"]},"input":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"companyName":{"type":"string"},"website":{"type":"string"},"contactName":{"type":"string"},"role":{"type":"string"},"industry":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"painHypothesis":{"type":"string"},"offer":{"type":"string"},"knownSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["companyName"]},"summary":{"type":"string"},"confidence":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"score":{"type":"number"},"label":{"type":"string","enum":["low","medium","high"]},"rationale":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["score","label","rationale"]},"risks":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"opportunities":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"nextActions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"questions":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"sourceAttribution":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"kind":{"type":"string","enum":["provided","recommended"]},"label":{"type":"string"},"url":{"type":["string","null"]},"relevance":{"type":"string"},"note":{"type":"string"}},"required":["kind","label","url","relevance","note"]}},"commercial":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"buyerRelationship":{"type":"string","enum":["new","repeat"]},"notes":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"recommendedOffers":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"endpoint":{"type":"string","enum":["opportunity-check","research-brief","company-intel","source-check","vendor-risk","deep-diligence","lead-brief"]},"title":{"type":"string"},"path":{"type":"string"},"stage":{"type":"string","enum":["entry","core","expansion"]},"priceUsd":{"type":["string","null"]},"reason":{"type":"string"},"suggestedUse":{"type":"string"}},"required":["endpoint","title","path","stage","priceUsd","reason","suggestedUse"]}}},"required":["stage","buyerRelationship","notes","recommendedOffers"]},"lead":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"companyName":{"type":"string"},"contactName":{"type":["string","null"]},"role":{"type":["string","null"]},"industry":{"type":"string"},"geography":{"type":"string"},"fit":{"type":"string","enum":["weak","moderate","strong"]}},"required":["companyName","contactName","role","industry","geography","fit"]},"brief":{"type":"object","additionalProperties":false,"properties":{"openingAngle":{"type":"string"},"valueHypothesis":{"type":"string"},"likelyPainPoints":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"objectionWatchlist":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}},"buyingSignals":{"type":"array","items":{"type":"string"}}},"required":["openingAngle","valueHypothesis","likelyPainPoints","objectionWatchlist","buyingSignals"]}},"required":["requestId","createdAt","endpoint","service","input","summary","confidence","risks","opportunities","nextActions","questions","sourceAttribution","commercial","lead","brief"]},"exampleRequest":{"companyName":"Harbor Ops","website":"https://example.com","contactName":"Avery Stone","role":"VP of Operations","industry":"Maritime logistics","geography":"United States","painHypothesis":"Manual vessel-status updates create avoidable coordination delays.","offer":"Agentic operations desk for status monitoring and follow-up drafting.","knownSignals":["Hiring coordinators","Publicly discussing workflow automation","Expanding into new ports"],"questions":["What business trigger makes this lead worth prioritizing this quarter?"]},"exampleResponse":{"requestId":"0d1f8aef-6d1a-4bd8-8dd6-c6058a11333b","createdAt":"2026-04-20T18:14:00.000Z","endpoint":"lead-brief","service":{"name":"Agent Research Desk","version":"1.1.0","x402Enabled":true,"network":"eip155:8453","price":"$0.05","url":"https://agent-research-brief-api-production.up.railway.app"},"input":{"companyName":"Harbor Ops","website":"https://example.com","contactName":"Avery Stone","role":"VP of Operations","industry":"Maritime logistics","geography":"United States","painHypothesis":"Manual vessel-status updates create avoidable coordination delays.","offer":"Agentic operations desk for status monitoring and follow-up drafting.","knownSignals":["Hiring coordinators","Publicly discussing workflow automation","Expanding into new ports"],"questions":["What business trigger makes this lead worth prioritizing this quarter?"]},"summary":"Harbor Ops looks like a strong operational-efficiency lead because the company is expanding while public signals suggest workflow strain, and the target contact likely owns the pain directly.","confidence":{"score":0.78,"label":"high","rationale":["The request names a company, contact role, pain hypothesis, offer, and several commercial signals.","That gives enough structure for an account-specific outreach hypothesis."]},"risks":["The pain hypothesis may be directionally right but still low-priority if there is no near-term service disruption.","Operational leaders may resist automation claims unless the rollout path is low-friction and reversible."],"opportunities":["Expansion into new ports can magnify coordination pain and make workflow automation newly urgent.","A VP of Operations is likely close enough to the process to validate pain quickly."],"nextActions":["Verify whether the company is actively scaling the exact workflow named in the hypothesis.","Tailor the first message around delay reduction, not generic AI productivity.","Prepare one low-risk pilot example that fits a VP of Operations decision frame."],"questions":["What business trigger makes this lead worth prioritizing this quarter?"],"sourceAttribution":[{"kind":"provided","label":"Company website","url":"https://example.com","relevance":"Account framing","note":"Use the company site to confirm operating model, expansion narrative, and contact relevance."},{"kind":"recommended","label":"Public growth and workflow signals","url":null,"relevance":"Prioritization","note":"Validate hiring, expansion, and process-change signals before outreach."}],"commercial":{"stage":"expansion","buyerRelationship":"new","notes":["Synthetic public example: buyer-level history is intentionally omitted from docs and landing-page examples.","This is already close to a sales action, so the next product should strengthen trust or sharpen one claim before outreach."],"recommendedOffers":[{"endpoint":"company-intel","title":"Company Intel","path":"/api/company-intel","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"A lead brief is stronger when paired with a fuller read on the account and its operating posture.","suggestedUse":"Use this if you want a cleaner account map before sending the first message."},{"endpoint":"source-check","title":"Source Check","path":"/api/source-check","stage":"entry","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"Validate one high-impact claim before you use it in outreach.","suggestedUse":"Run this on the proof point you plan to cite to the buyer."},{"endpoint":"research-brief","title":"Research Brief","path":"/api/research-brief","stage":"core","priceUsd":"$0.05","reason":"If the account points to a bigger market theme, expand it into a broader research plan.","suggestedUse":"Use this when the account-level insight should turn into a repeatable market thesis."}]},"lead":{"companyName":"Harbor Ops","contactName":"Avery Stone","role":"VP of Operations","industry":"Maritime logistics","geography":"United States","fit":"strong"},"brief":{"openingAngle":"Frame the outreach around avoidable coordination delays during expansion, not around AI as a category.","valueHypothesis":"If the team is scaling across more ports, a monitoring and follow-up desk could reduce manual status chasing and escalation lag.","likelyPainPoints":["Manual status updates across fragmented systems","Escalation delays when coordinators juggle too many exceptions","Growth forcing more work through the same operating headcount"],"objectionWatchlist":["Fear of workflow disruption","Need for clear human override","Skepticism about data accuracy or integration effort"],"buyingSignals":["Hiring coordinators","Publicly discussing workflow automation","Expanding into new ports"]}},"toolName":"create_lead_brief"}]}